Order

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

Miscellaneous Relief

Order

Order on Motion to Expedite

AMENDED complaint by Legend Pictures, LLC against The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A

附件：

1:Exhibit 4
2:Exhibit 3
3:Exhibit 2
4:Exhibit 1

MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. Upon review of the trademark and copyright infringement complaint and other filings, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all 284 defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20. See Viking Arm AS v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A,No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Indeed, Plaintiff filed a form complaint with generic allegations about coordinated counterfeiting activity between 284 defendants without any details whatsoever, which arguably violates the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10. Accordingly, by 9/29/25, Plaintiff must file either a memorandum explaining why joinder is proper or an amended complaint specifically naming and identifying each defendant being sued and setting forth with more than conclusory statements the alleged infringing activity. Failure to do so will result in the current complaint being dismissed without prejudice and this case being closed. Furthermore, Plaintiff has not established good cause under Local Rule 26.2 or Seventh Circuit precedent to justify sealing the names of defendants or documents pertaining to alleged infringing activity. "Secrecy makes little sense if the goal of the litigation is to protect rightholders' IP interests by obtaining an injunction against defendants' sales of infringing or counterfeit goods." See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 25 C 2937, 2025 WL 2299593 at *7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025) (Kness, J.). More importantly, this presumption of sealing runs counter to the well-established authority of this Circuit holding that "[m]any a litigant would prefer that the subject matter of a case. be kept from the curious (including its business rivals and customers), but the tradition that litigation is open to the public is of very long standing." See Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Leavell, 220 F.3d 562, 567-68 (7th Cir. 2000). [For those reasons, the motion for leave to file under seal [8] is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal the document filed at [2]. Mailed notice (gel,)

MOTION by Plaintiff Legend Pictures, LLC for leave to file certain documents under seal

COMPLAINT filed by Legend Pictures, LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24081038.

附件：

1:Exhibit 2 - Copyrights
2:Exhibit 1 - Trademarks