PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 11/26/2025. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [42] is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that he has acted expeditiously to protect his interests and that there remains a significant risk defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court finds that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [44] that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this action and the motion, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of any defendant. Enter preliminary injunction order. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the court's docket within five business days. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously-sealed documents: [2], [5], [16], [19]. Because no preliminary injunction hearing has been requested, the preliminary injunction hearing tentatively set for 12/2/2025 is stricken. Summons was issued on 11/18/2025, and Defendant's response to the complaint are due by 12/9/2025. Plaintiff should file any motion for entry of default and default judgment by 12/16/2028. If there are any remaining defendants whom default and default judgment are not being sought, Plaintiff is ordered to file a status report identifying each defendant against whom this case is proceeding and state whether the parties anticipate a settlement or further litigation. A telephone status hearing is set for 1/6/2026 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice

CERTIFICATE of Service in Compliance with Docket 43 by Joseph Wendell Droter on behalf of Michael Barcohana regarding terminate hearings, set/reset hearings, [43]

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion [42] for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, plaintiff must serve all remaining defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 11/25/2025." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 11/25/2025. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. A tentative preliminary injunction hearing is set for 12/2/2025 at 9:15 a.m. Status report due 11/21/2025 is stricken. Mailed notice

MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Barcohana for preliminary injunction

附件：

1:Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of J. Droter
2:Declaration of Joseph W. Droter in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
3:Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Barcohana as to AZURASPACE BEAUTY on 11/18/2025, answer due 12/9/2025.

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant AZURASPACE BEAUTY

SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) AZURASPACE BEAUTY by Plaintiff Michael Barcohana

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Telephone status hearing set for 11/18/2025 is stricken. By 11/21/2025, Plaintiff shall file a status report with an update on the case. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's second ex parte motion [36] to extend the temporary restraining order seeks to extend the sealed TRO entered on 10/21/2025 to maintain the status quo by an additional period of 14 days until 12/2/2025. Rule 65 dictates that a temporary restraining order cannot exceed 14 days, although the court may extend it "for a like period" for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(2). On 10/29/2025, this Court extended the TRO an additional 14 days until 11/18/2025. Doc. 32. Plaintiff's current request exceeds the maximum 28-day limit for a TRO. If a TRO extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under Rule 65(b), the extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 844 (7th Cir. 2012). A preliminary injunction requires notification to the opposing party. See Fed. R. Civ. 65(a)(1) (a "court may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverse party."). Because plaintiff did not provide the defendants identified in Amended Schedule A with notice of its intent to seek a preliminary injunction, plaintiff's motion to extend the TRO [36] is denied. Mailed notice

MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Barcohana for extension of time to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order Second Request

附件：

1:Memorandum in Support of Second Motion to Extend Temporary Restraining Order
2:Declaration of Joshua H. Sheskin in Support of Second Motion to Extend Temporary

STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 10/31/2025. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Third Party Confidentiality and Protective Order [33] is granted. Mailed notice

MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Barcohana for order to Enter Confidentiality and Protective Order Between Plaintiff and Non-Party TikTok Inc.

附件：

1:Exhibit Confidentiality and Protective Order

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order [30] is granted. For the reasons stated in Plaintiff's Memorandum [30-1], the Court finds good cause to extend the temporary restraining order an additional 14 days to 11/18/2025. Plaintiff shall file a preliminary injunction motion if appropriate no later than 11/11/2025. Telephone status hearing set for 11/4/2025 is stricken and reset to 11/18/2025 at 9:15.m. The call-in number is (855) 2448681 and the access code is 172 628 1276##. Attorneys of record may not use speakerphones during the status hearing. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice

SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 1,000 posted by Michael Barcohana (Document not scanned).

MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Barcohana for extension of time First Request to Extend Temporary Restraining Order

附件：

1:Declaration of Joshua H. Sheskin in Support of First Motion to Extend Temporary
2:Memorandum in Support of First Motion to Extend Temporary Restraining Order

SUMMONS - ERROR UNPROCESSED due to the defendant's address is missing from the "To" section of the summons

SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) AZURASPACE BEAUTY by Plaintiff Michael Barcohana

ELECTRONIC SERVICE AND EXPEDITED DISCOVERY ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 10/21/2025. Mailed notice

TEMPORARY Restraining Order Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 10/21/2025. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint [25], and motion for electronic service of process and expedited discovery [24] are granted. Plaintiff's submissions establish that were defendant to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that defendant could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, plaintiff's filings support proceeding on an ex parte basis at this time. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendant to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, the Court finds that it is likely that their assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendant, stopping defendant's infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. Further, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit products, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendant. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order at 12:00 p.m. on 10/21/2025. Plaintiff shall file the TRO extension motion (or a preliminary injunction motion) if appropriate no later than 10/28/2025. Telephone status hearing is set for 11/4/2025 at 9:15 a.m. The call-in number is (855) 2448681 and the access code is 172 628 1276##. Attorneys of record may not use speakerphones during the status hearing. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice

MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Barcohana for temporary restraining order RENEWED

附件：

1:Declaration of Joshua H. Sheskin in Support of Renewed Motion for Temporary Rest
2:Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of J. Sheskin
3:Declaration of Michael Barcohana in Support of Renewed Motion for Temporary Rest

MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Barcohana for service by publication, Electronic Service and Expedited Discovery RENEWED

附件：

1:Memorandum in Support of Renewed Motion for Electronic Service and Expedited Di
2:Declaration of Joshua H. Sheskin in Support of Renewed Motion for Electronic Ser

SECOND AMENDED complaint by Michael Barcohana against AZURASPACE BEAUTY and terminating The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A for Trademark Infringement

附件：

1:Exhibit 1 to the Complaint
2:Exhibit 2 to the Complaint

Order

Order on Motion for Service by Publication

SUPPLEMENT to amended complaint, [18] in Compliance with Docket 17

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Michael Barcohana Exhibit 2 to the Complaint regarding amended complaint, [18]

FIRST AMENDED complaint by Michael Barcohana against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A and terminating John Doe for Trademark Infringement

附件：

1:Exhibit 3 to the Complaint
2:Exhibit 1 to the Complaint
3:Exhibit 2 to the Complaint

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 4 is granted as to the request to file Docs. 2-2 and 2-3 under seal and denied as to the request to file Doc. 2 and 2-1 under seal and to proceed under a pseudonym. Exceptional circumstances have not been shown to proceed anonymously. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a) ("The title of the complaint must name all the parties[.]"); Doe v. Village of Deerfield, 819 F.3d 372, 377 (7th Cir. 2016) ("To proceed anonymously, a party must demonstrate 'exceptional circumstances' that outweigh both the public policy in favor of identified parties and the prejudice to the opposing party that would result from anonymity."); XYZ Corp. v. Partn. & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 2020 WL 6681360, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 12, 2020) ("No-name litigation is the rare exception, not the Rule."). "There is insufficient evidence. that Schedule A defendants are taking advantage of the case-tracking option to such an extent that it is materially impeding brand owners' enforcement efforts." XYZ Corp. v. Partn. & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 2022 WL 180151, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 20, 2022). Accordingly, by 9/26/2025, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint that lists plaintiff's true name. Moreover, plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process and expedited discovery 14 and plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 15 are entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint and the TRO submissions, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of 40 defendants in this case. See, e.g., Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 9/26/2025, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a single defendant or a smaller subset of defendants along with its memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. Mailed notice

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff John Doe Motion for Temporary Restraining Order regarding MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for temporary restraining order 15

附件：

1:Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of J. Sheskin
2:(Declaration of John Doe in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order)

MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for temporary restraining order

附件：

1:Declaration of Joshua H. Sheskin in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
2:Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of J. Sheskin
3:(Declaration of John Doe in Support of Temporary Restraining Order)

MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for service by publication, Electronic Service and Expedited Discovery

附件：

1:Exhibit Memorandum in Support of Motion for Electronic Service and Expedited Discovery
2:(Declaration of Joshua H. Sheskin in Support of Motion for Electronic Service and Expedited Discovery)

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Gokalp Bayramoglu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Joseph Wendell Droter

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Joshua Howard Sheskin

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by John Doe

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff John Doe Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of J. Sheskin regarding MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe to seal 4

附件：

1:(Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of J. Sheskin)

MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe to seal

附件：

1:Declaration of Joshua H. Sheskin in Support of Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
2:Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of J. Sheskin
3:(Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of J. Sheskin)

CIVIL Cover Sheet

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff John Doe Complaint for Trademark Infringement regarding complaint, 1

附件：

1:(Exhibit 3 to the Complaint)
2:Exhibit 2 to the Complaint
3:Exhibit 1 to the Complaint

COMPLAINT for Trademark Infringement filed by John Doe; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24023751.

附件：

1:(Exhibit 3 to the Complaint)
2:Exhibit 2 to the Complaint
3:Exhibit 1 to the Complaint