MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Plaintiff's memorandum in support of joinder of over 100 Defendants [15]. Plaintiff claims joinder is proper because "[t]he Defendants here share more than simply infringing the same Works; the evidence available to the Plaintiff at this juncture suggests that many of the online sellers share a number of operative facts: potential common ownership of accounts, common geographic operations, similar methodology in operation, and similar channels of securing counterfeit goods[.]" R. 15 at 7. For the reasons stated in the Court's order dismissing this case for misjoinder [12], these reasons are insufficient to establish the propriety of joinder. See also Toyota Motor Sales, 24-cv-09401 Dkt. 23 at 3 (analogizing Schedule A Defendants to vendors outside of a concert selling counterfeit t-shirts: "These vendors had the same profile. They sold the same merchandise. They used the same tactics to try to get attention. Two of them even offered similar deals ('two for $30'). One could even argue that they 'swarmed' the concert venue that evening. But that does not establish a logical relationship between them," "even if the t-shirts came from the same factory, and even if the unauthorized vendors employed the same hustle.") (cleaned up). And although Plaintiff argues that it will be more economical for the Court to allow joinder here, the Court cannot circumvent the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 for its own convenience. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint remains dismissed without prejudice for misjoinder. By 11/07/2025, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint naming one defendant. If Plaintiff's amended complaint names more than one defendant, Plaintiff must submit a memorandum along with sufficient documentary evidence in support of joinder under Rule 20. Mailed notice.

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin Memorandum in Support of Joinder

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated therein, Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file his memorandum in support of joinder [13] is granted. Plaintiff shall file his memorandum no later than 10/06/2025. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin for extension of time to file Memorandum in Support of Joinder

ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Order, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for misjoinder. Enter Order. By 09/22/2025, Plaintiff is directed to amend its complaint to eliminate all improperly joined defendants. If the amended complaint names more than one defendant, Plaintiff must simultaneously file a memorandum explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. The following motions are denied as moot: (1) Plaintiff's motion to seal [5]; (2) Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order [7]; (3) Plaintiff's motion to exceed page limitation [10]; (4) Plaintiff's motion to seal [11]. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 9/6/2025. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin to seal document sealed document, [9]

MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin for leave to file excess pages

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin

附件：

1:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 11 of 12)
2:(Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 12 of 12))
3:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 10 of 12)
4:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 9 of 12)
5:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 4 of 12)
6:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 5 of 12)
7:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 6 of 12)
8:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 7 of 12)
9:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 8 of 12)
10:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 2 of 12)
11:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 3 of 12)

AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin in Support of MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin for temporary restraining order [7]

附件：

1:Exhibit Exhibit 1
2:Declaration Declaration of Plaintiff
3:Declaration Declaration of David Gulbransen

MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin for temporary restraining order

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin to seal document sealed document[2]

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr

CIVIL Cover Sheet

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin Schedule A to Complaint

COMPLAINT filed by Dmytriy Bragin; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23834793.

附件：

1:Exhibit Exhibit 1