FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to a certain Defendant

ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice.

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to a certain Defendant

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to a certain Defendant

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendants

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendants

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion to vacate default [51] is denied because movants did not comply with the court's procedures for motions. Motions must be noticed for in-person presentment on the court's motion call. Notices Mailed.

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendants

MOTION by Defendants Quietchan, Tigersilver, Yingyoung to set aside judgment (Default)

附件：

1:Declaration Declaration of Jingyi Chen
2:Exhibit Exhibits 1-6
3:Memorandum in Support of Motion

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Quietchan, Tigersilver, Yingyoung by Lance Christopher Venable

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to a certain Defendant

NEW PARTIES: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A To The Complaint added to case caption.

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to a certain Defendant

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to a certain Defendant

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendants

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Fias Inc. as to certain Defendants

DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 7/24/2024. Notices Mailed.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Motion hearing held. With no objection, the motion for extension of time 41 is granted. Defendant YBLZGCN (No. 62) must respond to the complaint by 8/12/24. If the parties are unable to resolve the case, the parties shall file a status report with a proposed case schedule by 8/14/24. For the reasons stated in open court, the motion for default judgment 35 is granted. Enter Default Judgment Order. Notices Mailed.

MOTION by Defendant YBLZGCN for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint 1, CONSENTED

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Fias Inc. by Abby Marie Neu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant YBLZGCN by Yong Chen

AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Fias Inc. in Support of MOTION by Plaintiff Fias Inc. for default judgment as to all Defendants 35

NOTICE of Motion by Keaton David Smith for presentment of motion for default judgment 35 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 7/24/2024 at 09:45 AM.

MEMORANDUM by Fias Inc. in support of motion for default judgment 35

MOTION by Plaintiff Fias Inc. for default judgment as to all Defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Fias Inc. as to certain Defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Fias Inc. as to certain Defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Fias Inc. as to certain Defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Fias Inc. as to certain Defendants

NEW PARTIES: Asuexpect, BIVINAR, Chiinvent US, Cinblue, dayeshiqirenshangmaoyouxiangongsi, GCIREC Decor, HAOHEONLINE, haolinddd, husendain, JESTRONRY, JYHYQ, MAGICINHOME, Niwawa US, Qahing Decor, Quietchan, ruizon, Sunycler, SXCHEN, Taphome, Tigersilver, Vanwalk Direct, VODRM Group, WXCC US, WXYJUS, yangshu us, Yingyoung, Yorida, YQwolf, ZHLJ1992-ING, A home supply shop, Alexander life shop, Bellast, BONIUNIU, CHEN CASE, DAIMENG SS, Dreamspace, FANDI HOMETEXTILE, Feiyi home textile, GANJING, GIAOTIHM, Home decor door curtain, JiaHui daily necessit, KA SHUO, Lanp Rover, Madala fabric art, One begets, PUDUOH, SENSNING, Shehanxi Home Textile, smdiy, TengYeSe, TOSSZIX, UNICORNLY, Wealthy Carpet, Xinranjiaju, Yawwo, YBLZGCN, yetton, YOYO DECOR, YueYao, Zejunjiafeng, ZZSUPER, leskayiz Home and xiaxiagongsi added to case caption. Terminating The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A To The Complaint

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 7/2/2024. Notices Mailed.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Motion hearing held. For the reasons stated in open court, plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 23 is granted. Enter Preliminary Injunction Order. The Clerk is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Schedule A to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/instructions. Notices Mailed.

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Fias Inc. as to certain Defendants

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fias Inc. as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A To The Complaint on 6/27/2024, answer due 7/18/2024.

DECLARATION of Shengmao Mu regarding motion for preliminary injunction 23, memorandum in support of motion 24

NOTICE of Motion by Keaton David Smith for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction 23 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 7/2/2024 at 09:45 AM.

MEMORANDUM by Fias Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction 23

MOTION by Plaintiff Fias Inc. for preliminary injunction

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A To The Complaint

SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 50,000 posted by Fias Inc. (Document not imaged)

Disclosure by Fias Inc. of Plaintiff's Registered Copyrights

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Fias Inc. as to certain Defendants

SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 6/17/2024. Notices Mailed.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's ex parte motions 5 8 13 are granted, and no appearance is necessary. The plaintiff's written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits, the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any defendant were to appear and object, the court will take a fresh look at the asset freeze, joinder, and personal jurisdiction. The court finds that security in the amount of $50,000 is sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. The court declines to enter a TRO against Defendants 46 and 53 because the court could not readily identify an infringing work in the submitted evidence. Plaintiff's proposed TRO included a domain name transfer order, but there are no defendant domain names. No domain name transfer is appropriate (and in the future, if counsel submits a proposed order that is not tied to the specific evidence and defendants identified, the court may summarily deny all motions and unseal all filings). Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Notices Mailed.

MAILED Copyright Request letter to counsel of record

NOTICE of Motion by Shengmao Mu for presentment of motion for leave to file 5, motion for service by publication 8, motion for temporary restraining order 13 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 6/20/2024 at 09:45 AM.

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fias Inc. Wu Declaration

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fias Inc. memorandum in support of TRO

MOTION by Plaintiff Fias Inc. for temporary restraining order

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fias Inc. Exhibit 2-2

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fias Inc. Exhibit 2-1

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fias Inc. Exhibit 1

MEMORANDUM motion for service by publication 8 by Fias Inc.

MOTION by Plaintiff Fias Inc. for service by publication

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Fias Inc. by Keaton David Smith

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fias Inc. Schedule A

MOTION by Plaintiff Fias Inc. for leave to file certain documents under seal

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Fias Inc.

CIVIL Cover Sheet

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Fias Inc. by Shengmao Mu

COMPLAINT filed by Fias Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22144040.