MAILED copyright report with certified copy of minute order dated 5/30/2025 to Registrar, Washington DC. (jn,)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the notice of voluntary dismissal (Dckt. No. [34]) of Plaintiff's case against Defendant 10 on the amended Schedule A (Dckt. No. [26]). Defendant 10 has not answered the complaint, so the notice of dismissal is self-effectuating under Rule 41(a)(1)(a)(i). Defendant 10 is the only remaining Defendant in this case. With the dismissal of Defendant 10, no Defendants remain in the case. So the case is ripe for termination, as Plaintiff points out in its notice of dismissal (Dckt. No. [34]). The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The case is closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to Defendant 10

CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited regarding order on motion to amend/correct, set deadlines, 32

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff recently served process on Defendant. An answer is due by May 26, 2025. (Dckt. No. 31) The Court expects Plaintiff to move the case along in a timely manner. If Defendant misses the deadline, Plaintiff must file a motion for the entry of default and a default judgment no later than two business days after the deadline. A response to the motion for default judgment is due two weeks later. The Court reminds Plaintiff of the need to submit a Word version of a proposed judgment to the proposed order inbox, Proposed_Order_Seeger@ilnd.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this order and file a certificate of service. A failure to comply will lead to appropriate relief, including dismissal or the entry of judgment. Mailed notice (gel,)

NEW PARTIES: MFJESEAAFast Delivery Only 7-10 Days added to case caption.

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A Hereto on 5/5/2025, answer due 5/26/2025.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: On April 16, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for expedited third-party discovery and electronic service of process (Dckt. No. [23]). The Court permitted third parties 14 days to respond to discovery requests. Plaintiff had an obligation to serve those requests in a timely manner. Plaintiff must file a status report by May 9, 2025. Plaintiff must serve process by May 16, 2025. The Court expects Plaintiff to keep this case moving along. The Court directs the parties to engage in meaningful, good faith settlement discussions at the earliest opportunity. A failure to comply will lead to appropriate relief, including dismissal. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion to amend Schedule A (Dckt. No. [25]) is hereby granted. Plaintiff's notice of dismissal as to certain Defendants (Dckt. No. [24]) is self-effectuating under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Mailed notice

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Individuals and all other Defendants identified in the Complaint

SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) The Individuals and all other Defendants identified in the Complaint by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited

EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited Amended Schedule A regarding MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to amend/correct to Amend Schedule A [25]

MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to amend/correct to Amend Schedule A

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited ONLY as to Defendants 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 without Prejudice

ORDER GRANTING EXPEDITED THIRD-PARTY DISCOVERY AND ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 4/16/2025. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for an order granting electronic service of process and expedited discovery (Dckt. No. [21]) is hereby granted. Order to follow. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for order for Electronic Service and Expedited Discovery in Compliance with Docket 19

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The deadline to file a joint initial status report is extended to June 6, 2025. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and service of process by email and/or electronic publication (Dckt. No. [9]) is hereby granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process under Rule 4(f)(3) is granted. Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery from third parties is granted. Plaintiff's motion for a TRO is denied. Plaintiff failed to submit a proposed order to the proposed order inbox, in violation of this Court's Standing Order. Also, Plaintiff moved for a TRO over two months ago. Since that time, Plaintiff has not moved for the Court to expedite its ruling, and has not filed anything additional related to a TRO. But Plaintiff has filed voluntary dismissals in this case during that time. Based on the record, the Court finds that Plaintiff would not suffer irreparable harm in the absence of a TRO. So the Court hereby finds that Plaintiff has not satisfied all of the requirements for a TRO under Rule 65(b). Similarly, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion for an asset freeze. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend Schedule A to the complaint (Dckt. No. [13]) is hereby granted.Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The motion for excess pages (Dckt. No. [8]) is hereby granted. Mailed notice

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited ONLY as to Defendant 8

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited ONLY as to Defendant 1

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The motion for leave to withdraw counsel of record (Dckt. No. [14]) is granted. Attorney Shawn Anthony Mangano is terminated as counsel of record. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Attorney Shawn A. Mangano to withdraw as attorney for Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited. No party information provided

MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to amend/correct MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for temporary restraining order INCLUDING A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, A TEMPORARY ASSET RESTRAINT, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, AND SERVICE OF PROCESS BY E-MAIL AND/OR ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION [9], complaint, [1] Motion for Leave to Amend Schedule A to the Complaint and Exhibit 7 to the Temporary Restraining Order

附件：

1:Exhibit Amended Exhibit 7 to Temporary Restraining Order
2:Exhibit Amended Schedule A

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Gokalp Bayramoglu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joseph Wendell Droter

MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for temporary restraining order INCLUDING A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, A TEMPORARY ASSET RESTRAINT, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, AND SERVICE OF PROCESS BY E-MAIL AND/OR ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION

附件：

1:Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
2:Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
3:Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
4:Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
5:Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
6:Declaration of K. Kuhn in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
7:Declaration of K. Kuhn in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order rega
8:Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
9:Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn

MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for leave to file excess pages IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by April 7, 2025. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HONG KONG LEYUZHEN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HONG KONG LEYUZHEN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD by Shawn Anthony Mangano

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by HONG KONG LEYUZHEN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

CIVIL Cover Sheet

COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement filed by HONG KONG LEYUZHEN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22959014.

附件：

1:Exhibit 2 to the Complaint
2:Exhibit 1 to the Complaint