FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order, entered judgment[50] in the amount of $5,000 as to certain defendant

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order, entered judgment[50] in the amount of $5,000 as to certain defendant

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order, entered judgment[50] in the amount of $5,000 as to certain defendants

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order, entered judgment[50] in the amount of $5,000 as to certain defendant

CITATION to Discover Assets issued as to ContextLogic, PayPal, Amazon, (Third Parties) No notices filed.

PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 1/10/2023. Mailed notice.

FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 1/10/2023. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dckt. No. 45) is hereby granted. The answers are long overdue. The Court enters final judgment against all remaining Defendants. Final Judgment Order to follow. Permanent Injunction Order to follow. The motion for a preliminary injunction (Dckt. No. 34) is hereby denied as moot. There are no remaining defendants. The case is closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.

ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice.

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 46

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

MEMORANDUM by Nike, Inc. in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment 45

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for entry of default as to all Defendants, MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for default judgment as to all Defendants

附件：

1:(Exhibit A)

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nike, Inc. as to a Certain Defendant

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nike, Inc. as to a Certain Defendant

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nike, Inc. as to certain defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nike, Inc. as to certain defendant

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nike, Inc. as to certain defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nike, Inc. as to certain defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nike, Inc. as to certain defendant

STATUS Report by Nike, Inc.

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nike, Inc. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" on 10/24/2022, answer due 11/14/2022.

附件：

1:Declaration of Marcella D. Slay
2:Exhibit A

DECLARATION of Jake M. Christensen regarding motion for preliminary injunction[34]

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for preliminary injunction

附件：

1:Exhibit A

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Dckt. No. 32) is hereby granted in part. The Court extends the TRO to October 28, 2022. Mailed notice

MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order

附件：

1:Declaration of Jake M. Christensen

SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 217,000 posted by Nike, Inc. (document not imaged)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (Dckt. No. [28]) is hereby granted. Plaintiff needs time to collect the email addresses for the defendants and then effectuate service of process. The Court directs Plaintiff to effectuate service of process by October 24, 2022, and promptly file a proof of service. A status report is due by October 26, 2022. The Court vacates the other dates, and will reset the remaining dates by separate order. Responses to the complaint are due within the time set by the Federal Rules after service of process. Mailed notice

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nike, Inc. as to certain defendants

MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for extension of time of Deadlines set in Order [25], MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for reconsideration regarding order on motion for leave to file, order on motion for temporary restraining order, order on motion for miscellaneous relief, text entry, [25]

附件：

1:Declaration of Amy C. Ziegler

SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 10/4/2022. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's counsel has gotten into the habit of moving for a temporary restraining order, and then, two weeks later, reflexively filing a motion for a two-week extension of the TRO. Plaintiff's counsel does so as a matter of course, and has gotten too comfortable with that schedule. That bad habit creates extra burdens for the Court. It means that this Court has to handle two TRO motions per case. And Plaintiff's counsel has filed hundreds of Schedule A cases in the past two years alone. So, that habit leads to hundreds of extra motions raining down on the federal courthouse, from a single law firm. The Court forewarns Plaintiff's counsel that it is not inclined to grant any extensions, including any extensions of the TRO, so Plaintiff must be prepared to comply. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal (Dckt. No. [3]) is hereby granted. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (Dckt. No. [14]) is hereby granted in part. Temporary Restraining Order to follow. For now, the Court is granting an asset freeze. But this Court is inclined to lift the asset freeze at a later time unless Plaintiff later seeks equitable monetary relief (like an accounting of profits) or unless Plaintiff can point this Court to a statute that expressly authorizes an asset freeze in connection with statutory damages. Motion for electronic service of process (Dckt. No. [19]) is hereby granted. Plaintiff must effectuate service of process by October 7, 2022. Responses to the complaint are due by October 21, 2022. Motions for default and default judgment are due by October 24, 2022. Responses are due by October 27, 2022. A failure to comply will lead to dismissal. The Court directs counsel to serve a copy of this Order and any forthcoming motion on Defendants, and file a certificate of service. Mailed notice.

Statement Regarding Asset Freeze STATEMENT by Nike, Inc. per 23

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed Plaintiff's motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order (Dckt. No. 14). The proposed minute order includes a request for an asset freeze. By August 19, 2022, Plaintiff must file a statement and point to the statutory provision that gives this Court the power to impose an asset freeze at the outset of the case. If Plaintiff cannot point to a specific statutory provision, then Plaintiff must address how its request for an asset freeze is consistent with Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999). In its memo, Plaintiff argues that "[c]ourts have the inherent authority to issue a prejudgment asset restraint when plaintiff's complaint seeks relief in equity." See Mem., at 12. In Grupo Mexicano, the Supreme Court held that a district court has "no authority to issue a preliminary injunction preventing [a defendant] from disposing of their assets pending adjudication of [plaintiff's] contract claim for money damages." Id. at 333. The Supreme Court adhered to the long-standing rule that "a judgment establishing the debt was necessary before a court of equity would interfere with the debtor's use of his property." Id. at 321. "However, the [Grupo] [C]ourt specifically noted that a restraint on assets was still proper if a suit sought equitable relief." See CSC Holdings, Inc. v. Redisi, 309 F.3d 988, 996 (7th Cir. 2002) (citing Grupo, 527 U.S. at 333; Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp., 311 U.S. 282, 288 (1940)). "[A]s a general matter [] prejudgment asset restraints are not proper simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." See Banister v. Firestone, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. 2018). An equitable restraint at the outset of the case might be doable if Plaintiff obtained equitable monetary relief at the end of the day, like an accounting of profits. See Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 2013 WL 12314399 (N.D. Ill. 2013). But as a practical matter, in Schedule A cases, that recovery almost never happens, if at all. Instead, plaintiffs rush into court, seek and obtain an asset freeze, obtain a default judgment, and then ask district courts to unfreeze the money and award statutory damages, not equitable relief. In that scenario, it is not clear to this Court that it would be appropriate to use any frozen funds for any recovery of statutory damages, because statutory damages are a remedy at law, not a remedy in equity. If Plaintiff believes that it is appropriate for this Court to freeze funds at the outset of the case, and then use those funds to recover statutory damages (not equitable monetary relief) at the end of the case, then Plaintiff must explain why. Mailed notice.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. by Marcella Deshonda Slay

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 20

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:(Exhibit 2)

MEMORANDUM by Nike, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 19

MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. Exhibit 3 - Parts 1-9 regarding declaration 17

附件：

1:Exhibit 3-1
2:Exhibit 3-2
3:Exhibit 3-3
4:Exhibit 3-4
5:Exhibit 3-5
6:Exhibit 3-6
7:Exhibit 3-7
8:Exhibit 3-8
9:(Exhibit 3-9)

DECLARATION of Joe Pallett regarding memorandum in support of motion 15

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:(Exhibit 2)

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 15

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:(Exhibit 4)

MEMORANDUM by Nike, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 14

MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for temporary restraining order Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger for all further proceedings. Honorable Robert W. Gettleman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 4/8/22.

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey I. Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. by Rachel S Miller

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. by Jake Michael Christensen

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Nike, Inc.

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Nike, Inc.

CIVIL Cover Sheet

MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for leave to file under seal

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

COMPLAINT filed by Nike, Inc.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19322189.

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4