ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed by the courtroom deputy on 03/13/2023. Emailed notice

ORDER signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Order, the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is granted. As explained in the Order, judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant in the amount of fifty-thousand ($50,000). Given the finding of willfulness based on the default, a permanent injunction shall be entered. A separate AO-450 judgment shall be entered. The tracking status hearing of 03/17/2023 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 35

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment 34

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for entry of default, MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for default judgment as to all Defendants

附件：

1:(Exhibit A)

NEW PARTIES: Kapalai Co. ltd added to case caption.

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 2/16/2023. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the continued applicability of the circumstances that justified entry of the TRO, the motion for preliminary injunction 29 is granted. In light of the answer deadline of 03/03/2023, the tracking status hearing of 02/17/2023 is reset to 03/17/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report by 03/08/2023, or the Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment if the Defendants has not appeared. If the Defendant does not respond to the complaint by 03/03/2023, then the Defendant shall be deemed in default. Mailed notice

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dyson Technology Limited as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 2/10/2023, answer due 3/3/2023.

附件：

1:(Exhibit A)
2:Declaration of Andrew D. Burnham

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for preliminary injunction 29

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)
2:Declaration of Jake M. Christensen

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for preliminary injunction

附件：

1:(Exhibit A)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the continued applicability of the circumstances that justified entry of the initial TRO, the motion to extend the TRO 26 is granted. The TRO is extended through 02/20/23. The tracking status hearing of 02/03/2023 is reset to 02/17/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report by 02/10/2023, or the Plaintiff shall file a motion for preliminary injunction if appropriate. Emailed notice

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of extension of time[26]

附件：

1:Declaration of Jake M. Christensen

BOND in the amount of $ 1,000.00 company check, Receipt No. 4624282008, posted by Dyson Technology Limited

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Andrew Daniel Burnham

SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 01/23/2023. Emailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Plaintiff's motion [14] for temporary restraining order and other relief is granted. An order will be entered under seal separately. Although the Court again expresses its concern about restraining assets before judgment, Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo v. Alliance Bond Fund, 527 U.S. 308, 331 (1999), the Plaintiff does invoke a statutory remedy, namely, an accounting of profits (that is, disgorgement of profits) under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), which is not a mere common-law equitable claim and thus could allow for pre-judgment restraint. Indeed, trademark owners need only "prove defendant's sales only; defendant must prove all elements of costs or deduction claimed." 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a). To the extent that the restraint might be too broad, the Defendant may appear and file challenges to the scope of the TRO. The balance of factors tips in favor of Plaintiff being able to freeze the assets without advance warning to the Defendant, who likely would seek to transfer the money elsewhere. The Plaintiff's motion [3] for leave to file under seal is granted in light of the asset-restraint goal. By 01/25/2023, the Plaintiff shall email a redacted version of the TRO that can be entered publicly (redacting the names of Defendant and omitting Amended Schedule A). The Plaintiff's motion [19] for electronic service of process is granted. To track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called), a status hearing is set for 02/03/2023 at 8:30 a.m. The Plaintiff shall file the TRO extension motion (or a preliminary injunction motion) no later than 01/30/2023. Emailed notice

ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice.

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 20

附件：

1:(Exhibit 2)
2:Exhibit 1

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 19

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limitedfor Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 4 regarding declaration 17

附件：

1:(Exhibit 4-1)

DECLARATION of Giles Samuel Lane regarding memorandum in support of motion 15

附件：

1:(Exhibit 3)
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 1

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 15

附件：

1:(Exhibit 4)
2:Exhibit 3
3:Exhibit 2
4:Exhibit 1

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order 14

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Schedule A regarding amended complaint[12]

AMENDED complaint by Dyson Technology Limited against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

附件：

1:Exhibit 3
2:Exhibit 4
3:Exhibit 2
4:Exhibit 1

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Jake Michael Christensen

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Lawrence J. Crain

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin R. Gaudio

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Dyson Technology Limited

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dyson Technology Limited

CIVIL Cover Sheet

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for leave to file under seal

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Schedule A regarding complaint 1

COMPLAINT filed by Dyson Technology Limited; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20132198.

附件：

1:Exhibit 4
2:Exhibit 3
3:Exhibit 1
4:Exhibit 2