FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order[59] in the amount of $100,000 as to certain defendant

FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/12/2022. Mailed notice

ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/12/2022. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice

CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited pursuant to [56]

附件：

1:Exhibit A
2:Exhibit 1

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion [53] for entry of default and default judgment against all Defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 8/10/2022. If no objections are filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within two business days of its entry on the docket and must file proof of service within three business of service being effected. Mailed notice

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[54]

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment[53]

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for entry of default, MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for default judgment as to all Defendants

附件：

1:Exhibit A

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dyson Technology Limited as to a certain Defendant

ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 7/25/2022: Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited's motion for sanctions (Dkt. 46) is granted. Defendant Jeeti813's Answer (Dkt. 36) is stricken. See accompanying Statement for details. Mailed notice

CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited per 49

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The motion hearing set for 7/19/2022 at 10:50 AM is reset for 7/19/2022 at 10:20 AM. TIME CHANGE ONLY. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this minute order consistent with the alternative means of service previously used by Plaintiff (see, e.g., Dkt 30) and must file proof of service within three days. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. Members of the public and media may listen to these proceedings by using the number. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice

CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited per 47

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Any response to Plaintiff's motion for sanctions 46 must be filed on or before 6/22/2022. Any reply must be filed on or before 6/29/2022. On or before 6/17/2022, Plaintiff must serve a copy of this minute order consistent with the alternative means of service previously used by Plaintiff (see, e.g., Dkt 30) and must file proof of service within three days. Status hearing set for 6/23/2022 is stricken and reset for 7/19/2022 at 10:50 AM. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. Members of the public and media may listen to these proceedings by using the number. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for sanctions pursuant to Rule 37

附件：

1:Declaration of Jake M. Christensen
2:Exhibit 1

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Motion by counsel to withdraw as attorney 44 is granted for the reasons stated in the motion. Attorney Robert Michael Dewitty is withdrawn as counsel of record. Status hearing set for 6/23/2022 at 10:20 AM. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice

MOTION by Attorney Robert DeWitty and William Leonard to withdraw as attorney for The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A". New address information: jeeti813

附件：

1:(Exhibit)

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dyson Technology Limited as to certain defendant

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Motion by counsel to withdraw as attorney 41 is granted. Attorney Abby Marie Neu is withdrawn as counsel of record. Mailed notice

MOTION by Attorney Abby M. Neu to withdraw as attorney for Dyson Technology Limited. No party information provided

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant JEETI813's motion 38 for leave to file an out of time answer is granted, good cause having been shown under FRCP 6(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff's motion 37 to strike is denied. Mailed notice

RESPONSE by The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" in Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited to strike answer to complaint[36] [37]

MOTION by Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" for leave to file Answer nunc pro tunc

附件：

1:Declaration

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited to strike answer to complaint[36]

First ANSWER to Complaint by The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" by Robert Michael Dewitty

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 2/18/2022. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 28 is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that Plaintiff has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established 30 32 that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but, despite the Court having provided 31 the opportunity to do so, no Defendant has objected to the motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the docket within five business days. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously-sealed documents. Mailed notice

CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited regarding terminate deadlines and hearings, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, 31

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion [28] for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, which is entered and continued, Plaintiff must serve all Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects on or before 2/14/2022." Plaintiff must file proof of service of the Court's statement within two business days of service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering and extending the TRO, as well as in Plaintiff's earlier motion [23] for an extension, the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dyson Technology Limited as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" on 2/1/2022, answer due 2/22/2022.

附件：

1:Declaration of Abby M. Neu
2:Exhibit A

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for preliminary injunction 28

附件：

1:Declaration of Jake M. Christensen
2:Exhibit 1

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for preliminary injunction

附件：

1:Exhibit A

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"

EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 1/26/2022. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's Motion for extension of time of temporary restraining order 23 is granted. Enter separate order.Mailed notice

SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by Dyson Technology Limited.

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of extension of time[23]

附件：

1:Declaration of Jake M. Christensen

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order

SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER: Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 1/7/2022.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 3, ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order and other relief 11, and motion for electronic service of process 16 are granted in part. Plaintiff's submissions (including the Declaration of Giles Samuel Lane 14) establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries 2 and 15. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an equitable accounting. In addition, the Court finds, at least for now on this limited and one-sided record and without prejudice to revisiting the issue, that it has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing and counterfeit versions of Plaintiff's trademarks to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As this Court and others have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all Defendants in this one action and whether plaintiff will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will reconsider the asset freeze and joinder. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Dyson Technology Limited

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dyson Technology Limited

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 17

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 16

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 4 Parts 1-2 regarding declaration 14

附件：

1:Exhibit 4-1
2:Exhibit 4-2

DECLARATION of Giles Samuel Lane regarding memorandum in support of motion 12

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 12

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order 11

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.

MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1, List of Trademarks)

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Abby Marie Neu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Jake Michael Christensen

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Lawrence J. Crain

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin R. Gaudio

CIVIL Cover Sheet

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for leave to file under seal

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

COMPLAINT filed by Dyson Technology Limited; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18874956.

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4