FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 54 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendant

MAILED $10,000 surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to plaintiffs' counsel, Justin Gaudio, Greer Burns & Crain Ltd, 300 South Wacker Drive Suite 2500 Chicago, IL, 60606, via certified mail #7019 2280 0000 0962 5865

MAILED patent report with certified copy of final judgment order dated 11/5/2021 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 11/5/2021. Mailed notice.

ORDER: In the court's 10/7/2021 minute entry 52, it gave all defendants until 10/21/21 to object to plaintiffs' motion for entry of default and default judgment 47. The court grants plaintiffs' motion 47 for entry of default and default judgment against all defendants identified on Schedule A attached to the court's order. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiffs have established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded as set forth in the Final Judgment Order, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiffs have shown that the infringement of its design patent causes it irreparable harm in the form of consumer confusion, loss of customers' goodwill, and reputational harm; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendants have appeared to argue otherwise; thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. The ten thousand dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by plaintiff is hereby released to plaintiffs' counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the $10,000 surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to plaintiffs' counsel, Justin Gaudio, Greer Burns & Crain Ltd, 300 South Wacker Drive Suite 2500 Chicago, IL, 60606, via certified mail. Enter Final Judgment. Terminate civil case. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 11/5/2021. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court takes plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment 47 under advisement. Any defendant objecting to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and for default judgment 47 must enter an appearance and file a written objection by 10/21/2021. If no objections are filed, the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendants artxdhk at Line No. 1, fastoper_1 at Line No. 11, gpc663 at Line No. 15, lanla_5891 at Line No. 22, linxia-2136 at Line No. 25, wardcoffey at Line No. 35, yalu95 at Line No. 38, boebrykira at Line No. 44, Growth Wang, at Line No. 57, Jacky Lee at Line No. 64, snxmgngve at Line No. 83, suieefg6 at Line No. 88, and wolindtgvls at Line No. 95 are hereby dismissed with leave to reinstate within two hundred and seventy (270) days pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal Under Rule 41(a)(1) filed by Plaintiff on 9/30/2021.

NOTICE by Chrome Cherry Limited re MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for entry of default as to all DefendantsMOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for default judgment as to all Defendants 47

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 48

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

MEMORANDUM by Chrome Cherry Limited in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment 47

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for entry of default as to all Defendants, MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for default judgment as to all Defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Chrome Cherry Limited as to certain defendants

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendants Kelly WaldenW at Line No. 68 and Lady Cipria she at Line No. 70 are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal Under Rule 41(a)(1) 44 filed by Plaintiff on 8/27/2021.

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Chrome Cherry Limited as to certain defendants

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendants best4choose at Line No. 3, ORAZIO JEWELRY at Line No. 74, xuenvzhuang at Line No. 100, zhangzhongjie at Line No. 105 are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal Under Rule 41(a)(1) 42 filed by Plaintiff on 8/6/2021.

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Chrome Cherry Limited as to certain defendants

ORDER: Defendants Karmamedia at Line No. 66; OSVPZ at Line No. 75; sahnriedle at Line No. 80; Soft cloudlets Hats at Line No. 84; and sqeenday at Line No. 85 are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal Under Rule 41(a)(1) 40 filed by Plaintiff on 7/30/2021. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 7/30/2021. Mailed notice

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Chrome Cherry Limited as to certain defendants

ORDER: Defendants ananshangmao at Line No. 40; dongmeihua at Line No. 51; hushengjie at Line No. 61; huyuehao at Line No. 62; shandong store at Line No. 81; shanghai candy baby store at Line No. 82; wreuqj84324 at Line No. 96; xiaoyaowazi at Line No. 98; and yiwutanglei trading company at Line No. 102 are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal Under Rule 41(a)(1) 38 filed by Plaintiff on 7/16/2021. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 7/16/2021. Mailed notice

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Chrome Cherry Limited as to certain defendants

NEW PARTIES: artxdhk, basket1100, best4choose, bestmall99, brilliant-pi, byyoursideseller, chloekylie, dlty-39, easyup-4, faga999, fastoper_1, fat-mango, fire_evolution, flowersgrass, gpc663, happtimee, henuoshengwu, hycsh_86, iklq_55, italyanest, kujikeleya, lanla_5891, lantunjiaoyu, legend-diaochan, linxia-2136, love24-live, lovelife.autumn, luohjla_6, onlytheones, pucky-jester, rasgswkgflgq45, talking-moon, tunjy01, vlkazy78, wardcoffey, wuhinwuhou, xuanx_48, yalu95, Alice zhang dedianpu, ananshangmao, B44 CATALAN BISTRO, BIEJINGGUSHI, bigblizzard, boebrykira, Bratte Hunt, chaizijiaren258, championet, Cold Grassland, CYstudio JP, Delaware wang, dongmeihua, Donlorenz, dwlwklwlk, ethereall, Gagaijsk87s, Golden Key Contractors, Growth Wang, hkfyigup9, holy yeah, hujingjing4806, hushengjie, huyuehao, Hvocan, Jacky Lee, jiangyuman3023, Karmamedia, kaykail, Kelly WaldenW, laburnum, Lady Cipria she, Lagar, Lemmint, markijomin, ORAZIO JEWELRY, OSVPZ, Prodigy Sports, Richlogs, Risangan, sadetti001, sahnnriedle, shandong store, shanghai candy baby store, snxmgngve, Soft cloudlets Hats, sqeenday, sradmohl, Stom49, suieefg6, sumous2011, TheWorkBarcelona, Uclenana, wangchaoping8448, wangyanan4175, wangzhili0381, wolindtgvls, wreuqj84324, wuyox, xiaoyaowazi, xieandong3405, xuenvzhuang, yinhang9804, yiwutanglei trading company, yixuan lin, zhangxinnan8881, zhangzhongjie and zhouguowei0196 added to case caption.

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 6/22/2021. Mailed notice

ORDER: No defendant has filed an appearance to object to the entry of a preliminary injunction. For the same reasons the TRO was granted, a preliminary injunction is appropriate, and is unopposed. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [31] is granted. Enter Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Schedule A to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/instructions. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 6/22/2021. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice. The court has taken the motion for preliminary injunction 31 under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 6/18/2021.

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chrome Cherry Limited as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" on 6/10/2021, answer due 7/1/2021.

附件：

1:Declaration of Martin F. Trainor

NOTICE by Chrome Cherry Limited re MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for preliminary injunction [31]

MEMORANDUM by Chrome Cherry Limited in support of motion for preliminary injunction[31]

附件：

1:Declaration of Justin R. Gaudio
2:Exhibit 1

MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for preliminary injunction

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"

EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 5/27/2021:

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's ex parte motion to extend the temporary restraining order 26 is granted. For the reasons set forth in plaintiff's supporting memorandum of law 27 and in the court's prior order granting the temporary restraining order 23, good cause for a 14-day extension exists under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b)(2). The Temporary Restraining Order is extended to and including 6/15/2021.

NOTICE by Chrome Cherry Limited re MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order[26]

MEMORANDUM by Chrome Cherry Limited in support of extension of time 26

附件：

1:Declaration of Justin R. Gaudio

MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order

SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by Chrome Cherry Limited. (Document not imaged)

SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 5/18/2021:

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: For the reasons set forth in plaintiff's motions, the supporting memoranda, and the temporary restraining order, plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal 4, for electronic service of process 17, and for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint and expedited discovery 12 are granted. Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis. Specifically, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a substantial likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement of plaintiff's patent and sales into Illinois), the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and an injunction is in the public interest "because infringement interferes with the property rights inherent in plaintiff's patent, including plaintiff's right to control its design. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. The harm to plaintiff's patent rights may be more compensable through damages than in other similar trademark cases brought by counsel. Patent protection is not intended to address public perception of the source of goods; consumer confusion is a less weighty concern here. Nevertheless, there is some irreparable harm and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement." Oakley, Inc. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 1:20-cv-02970, Dkt. 33 (N.D. Ill. May 22, 2020). Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. As other judges in this district have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all defendants in this one action and whether plaintiff genuinely intends to pursue an accounting (which plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the court is persuaded that plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity (including evidence that defendants are selling the identical product from "one or a few common suppliers," see Oakley, Inc. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 1:21-cv-00536, Dkt. 14 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 6, 2021)) and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will revisit the asset freeze and joinder. Plaintiff shall deposit with the Clerk of Court ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), either cash or surety bond, as security. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order.

Notice of Claims Involving Patents by Chrome Cherry Limited

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Chrome Cherry Limited

NOTICE by Chrome Cherry Limited re MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for temporary restraining order Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery[12], MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) [17], MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for leave to file under seal[4]

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[18]

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2

MEMORANDUM by Chrome Cherry Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[17]

MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited Exhibit 2 regarding declaration[15]

DECLARATION of Pierre Swart regarding memorandum in support of motion[13]

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[13]

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2

MEMORANDUM by Chrome Cherry Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order[12]

MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for temporary restraining order Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold for all further proceedings. Honorable Joan H. Lefkow no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 5/14/2021.

MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited by Martin Francis Trainor

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited by Jake Michael Christensen

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited by Christopher S Hermanson

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited by Justin R. Gaudio

CIVIL Cover Sheet

MOTION by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited for leave to file under seal

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited Exhibit 1 regarding complaint[1]

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Chrome Cherry Limited Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

COMPLAINT filed by Chrome Cherry Limited; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18239494.

附件：

1:Exhibit 2
2:Exhibit 3
3:Exhibit 4
4:Exhibit 5