FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding entered judgment[50] in the amount of $100,000 as to certain defendant

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding entered judgment 50 in the amount of $100,000 as to certain defendant

RETURN of U.S. Post Office Receipt, article no. 7019 2280 0000 0962 6749.

MAILED original ten-thousand-dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by Richemont International SA, Cartier International A.G., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA, and Officine Panerai A.G. to Justin R. Gaudio, Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd, 300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 Chicago, IL. 60606 via certified mail # 7019 2280 0000 0962 6749.

MAILED trademark report with certified copy of order dated 1/31/2022 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The ten-thousand-dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by Plaintiffs is hereby released to Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA. or their counsel, Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to Justin R. Gaudio of Greer Burns & Crain Ltd., 300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, IL 60606 via certified mail. Mailed notice

ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice

ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 1/31/2022. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice

CERTIFICATE of Service by Abby Marie Neu on behalf of Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA regarding terminate deadlines and hearings, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, 47

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 44 for entry of default and default judgment against all Defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 1/18/2022. If no objections are filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within two business days of its entry on the docket and must file proof of service within three business of service being effected. Mailed notice

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion, 45

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

MEMORANDUM by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment, 44

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

MOTION by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA for entry of default as to all defendants, MOTION by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA for default judgment as to all defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA as to a certain defendant

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA as to a certain defendant

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA as to certain defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA as to certain defendant

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA as to certain defendants

NEW PARTIES: Beijing Xinmandi Trading Co., Ltd., Beyaly Jewelry (shenzhen) Limited, Dongguan Chengfen Jewelry Co., Ltd., Dongguan Dalingshan Yuanjing Jewelry Factory, Dongguan Jinyuan Jewelry Co., Ltd., Dongguan Keyu Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd, Dongguan Lianke Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd., Dongguan Sumyoung Jewelry Co., Ltd., Dongguan Yuli Jewelry Co., Ltd., Fujian Hongxin Yili International Trade Co., Ltd., Guang Zhou Stars Jewelry Co., Ltd., Guangdong Hangyang Flower Co., Ltd., Guangdong Xinsheng Trading Co., Ltd., Guangdong Xinwang Jewelry Co., Ltd., Guangxi Leqi Import And Export Trade Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Dingding Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Jieyusheng Trading Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Liwan Xulong Jewelry Firm, Guangzhou Panyu District Shatou Street Shining Jewelry Factory, Guangzhou Quake E-Commerce Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Ruidi Jewelry Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Xueni Jewelry Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Zhangjialiang Jewelry Co., Ltd., Haifeng Changsheng Jewelry Co., Ltd., Haifeng County Meilong Huangjia Sterling Silver Jewelry Firm, Jinhua Lateen Jewelry Co., Ltd., Shaoxing Zhulu Import And Export Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Daoyun Trade Co., Ltd., ShenZhen Miaoyin Jewelry Co.,Ltd., Shenzhen Qianziluo Jewelry Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Topmatop EC Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Xinboyi Metal Jewelry Factory, Sinotrendy Co., Ltd., Wuzhou Zuanfa Jewelry Co., Ltd., Xiamen Kuangyi Yuanda International Trade Co., Ltd., Xiamen Pengshanghao Import And Export Co., Ltd., Xiamen Zhongcun Helong Supply Chain Co., Ltd., Yiwu Baotuo Trading Co., Ltd., Yiwu Daifu E-Commerce Firm, Yiwu Duoyue Craft Co., Ltd., Yiwu Gbay Jewelry Co., Ltd., Yiwu Honghao Import And Export Co., Ltd., Yiwu Juice Fashion Accessory Co., Ltd., Yiwu Kiki Accessory Co., Ltd., YIWU MINGSE JEWELRY FACTORY, Yiwu Miwen Jewelry Co., Ltd., Yiwu Notting Trading Co., Ltd., Yiwu Qichang Import And Export Co., Ltd., Yiwu Qugou Trading Co., Ltd., Yiwu Shine Well Import&Export Co., Ltd., Yiwu Songchang Jewelry Co., Ltd., Yiwu Xiaxi Jewelry Factory, Yiwu Yiao Craft Co., Ltd., Yiwu Yigou Trading Co., Ltd., 925 Boutique Global Store Store, Agreeable Store, AYUTION Store, Beautifui baby Store, Braed Store, CBU Store, Copious Store, DWWXDP Store, fastso Official Store, Fun educational products Store, Fun products Store, Good Pen Store, Gu-Man Store, high quality tiff S925 silver Store, High-end boutique djg Store, High-end reproduction Store, Huayun Store, HZHKKL Store, JOD Official Store, lamavis H & J Boutique Store, LeYa Jewellry Store, LOVER-JEWELRY Store, LOVOACC Jewellery Store, MAIKEWEIER Store, minar official store, MonPen Store, origin-summer jewellery store, pass-through Store, poi369 Store, Rainbery Store, Scruples Store, Shiny Crystals Store, Shop911255309 Store, Shop911326121 Store, Shop911375265 Store, Shop911612475 Store, SHOW520 Store, SmartCloud Store, Stars Fossette Store, Uyghur Boutique Store, weihao888888 Store, Wu Ja Store, WYAZSY Store, YI888 Store, Yong Ai Jewellry Store, YY0928 Store, FashionLoverWorld Store Store, Jewelry-Enternal Store, Arain Culture, GuangRuiGongChengWuZiYouXianGongSi, Hechuang Huayi Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd., huafengqichemeirong, meetinnerx, pjlmeige, Sxdyy, This is a strange shop, TULIP LY, wanghongfeimeiguo, Women's Jewelry Store, xinxuzhiguang, YTEHETY, YUN FEI FAN, ZGHMJ, zhangzhouzhike, zhizhongwangluo, ahokaoneone, dianwedding, dongjings, duanyicc, dusann, gobuybuy2021, granthill, hezekiah jewelry, hhh2021, Just Don Shorts, kooduyus, lijiahai6, lovejiangge, mengqiqi08, mercytop, nxymode, rose105, shuainecklace, sunglasses_super, ukkdhgates, virginiadq, wjl666888, xiaodi0388, yong1, yuki_lee, fengzh_29, topwatchsale.me, nativeeast, xiaronghua098 and zhanglizhuo512 added to case caption.

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 11/15/2021. Mailed notice

ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [31] is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that Plaintiff has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [30] [34] that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but, despite the Court having provided [33] the opportunity to do so, no Defendant has objected to the motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the docket within five business days. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously-sealed documents. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 11/15/2021. Mailed notice

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA as to certain defendant

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA as to certain defendants

CERTIFICATE of Service per Order 33 by Abby Marie Neu on behalf of Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 31 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, Plaintiff must serve all Defendants with the following statement: The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects on or before 10/27/2021. Plaintiff must file proof of service of the Court's statement within two business days of service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering and extending the TRO, as well as in Plaintiff's earlier motion 26 to extend the TRO, the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice

MEMORANDUM by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA in support of motion for preliminary injunction[31]

附件：

1:Declaration of Justin R. Gaudio
2:Exhibit 1

MOTION by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA for preliminary injunction

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Cartier International A.G., Van Cleef & Arpels SA as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021.

附件：

1:Declaration of Abby Neu

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"

EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 10/6/2021. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiffs' Motion for extension of time of temporary restraining order[26] is granted. Enter separate order. Mailed notice

MEMORANDUM by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA in support of extension of time 26

附件：

1:Declaration of Justin R. Gaudio

MOTION by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order

SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA. (Document not scanned).

SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 9/24/2021.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The TRO entered on 9/24/2021 contained a scrivener's error in Paragraph 13 relating to the date the order was entered. As a remedy, the Court will enter an amended, sealed TRO with the same effective date and time of 1730 hrs U.T.C. (that's 12:30 p.m. CDT) on 9/24/2021 but with Paragraph 13 corrected. Entered Amended Temporary Restraining Order under seal. The Court regrets this error. Mailed notice

SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 9/23/2021.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file under seal 3, ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order 10, and motion for electronic service of process 16 are granted in part. Plaintiffs' submissions (including the Declaration of Emma-Jane Tritton 13 and the Declaration of Justin R. Gaudio 12) establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiffs' requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiffs may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries 2, 14, and 15. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiffs' filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiffs' interests in identifying defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an equitable accounting. In addition, the Court finds, at least for now on this limited and one-sided record and without prejudice to revisiting the issue, that it has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing and counterfeit versions of Plaintiffs' trademarks to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As this Court and others have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all Defendants in this one action and whether plaintiff will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiffs assert as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the court is persuaded that Plaintiffs have provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. A transfer of domain names is appropriate to prevent infringing conduct. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will reconsider the asset freeze and joinder. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 17

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3

MEMORANDUM by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA in support of motion for miscellaneous relief, 16

MOTION by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA Exhibit 22 regarding declaration, 13

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA Exhibit 21 Parts 1-3 regarding declaration, 13

附件：

1:Exhibit 21-1
2:Exhibit 21-2
3:Exhibit 21-3

DECLARATION of Emma-Jane Tritton regarding memorandum in support of motion 11

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4
5:Exhibit 5
6:Exhibit 6
7:Exhibit 7
8:Exhibit 8
9:Exhibit 9
10:Exhibit 10
11:Exhibit 11
12:Exhibit 12
13:Exhibit 13
14:Exhibit 14
15:Exhibit 15
16:Exhibit 16
17:Exhibit 17
18:Exhibit 18
19:Exhibit 19
20:Exhibit 20

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 11

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4

MEMORANDUM by Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 10

MOTION by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Domain Names, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA by Abby Marie Neu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA by Allyson M. Martin

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA by Amy Crout Ziegler

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA by Justin R. Gaudio

CIVIL Cover Sheet

MOTION by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA for leave to file under seal

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA under seal regarding complaint, [1]

COMPLAINT filed by Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Cartier International A.G., Van Cleef & Arpels SA; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18598633.

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4
5:Exhibit 5
6:Exhibit 6
7:Exhibit 7
8:Exhibit 8
9:Exhibit 9
10:Exhibit 10
11:Exhibit 11
12:Exhibit 12
13:Exhibit 13