ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed by the courtroom deputy on 01/11/2022. Emailed notice

FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 01/11/2022. Emailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Plaintiff's motion for default judgment 34 is granted, given the absence of a timely answer. The requested statutory damages of $50,000 is appropriate, as explained in the judgment order. A permanent injunction is warranted in light of the finding of willfulness. A separate AO-450 judgment shall be entered. The tracking status hearing of 01/14/2022 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice

NOTICE by Cartier International A.G. re MOTION by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. for entry of default as to all defendantsMOTION by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. for default judgment as to all defendants 34

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 35

附件：

1:Exhibit 1

MEMORANDUM by Cartier International A.G. in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment 34

MOTION by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. for entry of default as to all defendants, MOTION by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. for default judgment as to all defendants

STATUS Report by Cartier International A.G.

NEW PARTIES: allbrandfactory.com added to case caption.

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 12/3/2021: In light of the continued applicability of the circumstances that justified the entry of the TRO, the Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 29 is granted. The tracking status hearing of 12/08/2021 is reset to 01/14/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report (or if no one else is appeared, the Plaintiff shall file it) by 01/06/2022. Emailed notice

NOTICE by Cartier International A.G. re MOTION by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. for preliminary injunction 29

MEMORANDUM by Cartier International A.G. in support of motion for preliminary injunction 29

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Declaration of Justin R. Gaudio

MOTION by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. for preliminary injunction

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cartier International A.G. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" on 12/3/2021, answer due 12/24/2021.

附件：

1:Declaration of Abby Neu

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A."

REDACTED SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/24/2021. Emailed notice

SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/24/2021. Emailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Plaintiff's motion 13 for temporary restraining order and other relief is granted. An order will be entered under seal separately. Although the Court again expresses its concern about restraining assets before judgment, Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo v. Alliance Bond Fund, 527 U.S. 308, 331 (1999), the Plaintiff does invoke a statutory remedy, namely, an accounting of profits (that is, disgorgement of profits) under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), which is not a mere common-law equitable claim and thus could allow for pre-judgment restraint. Indeed, trademark owners need only "prove defendant's sales only; defendant must prove all elements of costs or deduction claimed." 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a). To the extent that the restraint might be too broad, the Defendant may appear and file challenges to the scope of the TRO. The balance of factors tips in favor of Plaintiff being able to freeze the assets without advance warning to the Defendant, who likely would seek to transfer the money elsewhere. The Plaintiff's motion 3 for leave to file under seal is granted in light of the asset-restraint goal. By 12/06/2021, The Plaintiff shall email a redacted version of the TRO that can be entered publicly (redacting the Defendant from the text of the order and omitting Amended Schedule A). The Plaintiff's motion 19 for electronic service of process is granted. To track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called), a status hearing is set for 12/08/2021 at 8:30 a.m. If appropriate, the Plaintiff shall file the TRO extension motion (or a preliminary injunction motion) no later than 12/03/2021. Emailed notice

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Cartier International A.G.

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Cartier International A.G.

NOTICE by Cartier International A.G. re MOTION by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Domain Names, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery[13], MOTION by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA for leave to file under seal[3], MOTION by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) [19]

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[20]

附件：

1:Exhibit 3
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 1

MEMORANDUM by Cartier International A.G. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[19]

MOTION by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. Exhibit 4 regarding declaration[16]

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. Exhibit 3 regarding declaration[16]

DECLARATION of Emma-Jane Tritton regarding memorandum in support of motion[14]

附件：

1:Exhibit 2
2:Exhibit 1

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[14]

附件：

1:Exhibit 4
2:Exhibit 3
3:Exhibit 2
4:Exhibit 1

MEMORANDUM by Cartier International A.G. in support of motion for temporary restraining order[13]

MOTION by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Domain Names, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Cartier International A.G. Schedule A regarding amended complaint, 11

AMENDED complaint by Cartier International A.G. against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" and terminating Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA, Chloe S.A.S. and Montblanc-Simplo GMBH

附件：

1:Exhibit 4
2:Exhibit 3
3:Exhibit 2
4:Exhibit 1

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA by Abby Marie Neu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA by Allyson M. Martin

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA by Amy Crout Ziegler

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA by Justin R. Gaudio

CIVIL Cover Sheet

MOTION by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA for leave to file under seal

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Cartier International A.G., Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA Schedule A regarding complaint, [1]

COMPLAINT filed by Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Cartier International A.G., Van Cleef & Arpels SA; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18880059.

附件：

1:Exhibit 13
2:Exhibit 11
3:Exhibit 12
4:Exhibit 10
5:Exhibit 9
6:Exhibit 8
7:Exhibit 7
8:Exhibit 6
9:Exhibit 5
10:Exhibit 4
11:Exhibit 3
12:Exhibit 2
13:Exhibit 1