NOTICE of cancellation and/or termination by national bond center. (Envelope postmarked 04/03/2025) (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 04/08/2025.)

ORDER Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 3/11/2025. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion for release of the surety bond 180 is granted. Separate order to issue. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for bond Motion for Release of Surety Bond

ENTERED stipulated final judgment Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 2/7/2025. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The agreed motion for a stipulated final judgment and injunction order 177 is granted. Separate order to issue. This order appears to resolve all matters raised by this case and there is nothing that remains for the Court to do. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for judgment and Injunction Order (Joint)

附件：

1:(Exhibit A)

ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice.

Joint STATEMENT by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court requests that the parties file a short statement on the docket by December 11, 2024 that indicates whether and which Defendants still remain as parties to this action in light of the various stipulations of dismissal [ 167, 170, 173 ]. Mailed notice.

STIPULATION of Dismissal As To Defendants Nos. 5, 6, 10, 14, 15, 16, 26, 27, 30, And 31

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Attorney Matthew D. Binder's motion to withdraw 171 is granted. Attorney Matthew D. Binder no longer assigned to this case Emailed notice

MOTION by Attorney Matthew D. Binder to withdraw as attorney for Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. No party information provided

STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Modern Stylish

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court sets the following fact discovery schedule after reviewing the parties' proposals: Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures are due by October 11, 2024; written discovery may first issue by October 11, 2024. All fact discovery shall be noticed in time for completion by June 3, 2025. An amendment to the pleadings or additions to the named parties must be filed by April 24, 2025. The parties' filing sets out their respective positions on the number of interrogatories and amount of necessary deposition time. Rather than wade into this debate now, the Court encourages the parties to work cooperatively on discovery as they have been doing in other Roadget cases, bearing in mind the proportionality requirement of Rule 26. A joint status report as to the progress of fact discovery is due by May 16, 2025, at which time the parties should confirm that fact discovery will close on time and the Court will enter the parties' proposed expert discovery schedule. Mailed notice.

STATUS Report (Joint) by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.

STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Certain Defendants

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In its prior order, the Court tentatively concluded that severance was appropriate but explained it would not order severance until it gave Roadget an opportunity to file an amended complaint to allege Defendants coordinate their infringement, an argument Roadget developed in its briefing but had not alleged in its original complaint. (See Dkt. 131 at 20 ("The Court agrees that if these facts were alleged, they would satisfy Rule 20(a)(2)(A).") Roadget has now filed an amended complaint that, among other things, adds allegations of coordinating exercised by Temu. [Dkt. 139 at paras. 17-19.] At the dismissal stage, the Court must take factual allegations as true and draw reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff. Choice v. Kohn L. Firm, S.C., 77 F.4th 636, 638 (7th Cir. 2023). The added allegations of coordination exercised by Temu, including retention of the same counsel in multiple cases, supports an inference of coordination sufficient to satisfy Rule 20(a)(2)(A)'s requirement that the claims against Defendants form a single series of transactions or occurrences. If, as Roadget alleges, Temu coordinates or directs Defendants' sales of the allegedly infringing products, then there is a logical relationship between the claims against Defendants, which stem from that central coordination. See In re EMC, 677 F.3d 1351, 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2012) Therefore, the renewed motion to sever 162 is denied. By September 24, 2024 the parties are to file a proposed fact discovery schedule so that fact discovery can promptly get underway. Mailed notice.

REPLY by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to response to motion, 164, MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever Under Rules 20 and 21 162

RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever Under Rules 20 and 21 162

MEMORANDUM by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto in support of motion to sever 162

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever Under Rules 20 and 21

Defendant Guangzhou Shengmin Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA TT and MM (No. 31 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Tianmen Tongxin E-Commerce Business Department's DBA TongxinShow (No. 30 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Guangzhou Tinglin Clothing Firm's DBA TL Ladies (No. 29 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Haikou Meilan District Ayer Clothing Store's DBA Sunseeker leaf clothing (No. 27 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Haikou Longhua Huanyou Yanxuan Department Store's DBA SKE (No. 26 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Guangzhou Jinglun Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA OYIJIA (No. 22 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Tianmen Shangyan Clothing Store's DBA Musangyi clothing (No. 19 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Dongguan Yizhifang Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Monca (No. 18 in Schedule A) and DBA Saso (No. 24 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Xinhui District Wenqi Garment Factory's DBA MODERN STYLISH (No. 17 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Guangzhou Aisiyuan Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Modern style (No. 16 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Lijie He's DBA Miaoshang Clothing (No. 15 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Tianmen Maqiduo Clothing Factory's DBA Macchiatto Red (No. 14 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Guangzhou Xinfengyi Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Hongqin (No. 10 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Shahe Xiameng Clothing Store's DBA focus queen (No. 9 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Tianmen Zhanggang Duoxi Clothing's DBA Duoxi Clothing (No. 6 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Quanzhang Yang's DBA Cantonese C (No. 5 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Guangzhou Baishan Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA baishan (No.4 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Lihong Hu's dba A YI YUAN (No. 2 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff has filed the amended complaint 139. The order entered 7/24/2024 142 is AMENDED. Defendants may renew their motion to sever by August 14, 2024; any response is due by August 28, 2024 and any reply is due by September 4, 2024. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Roadget's Amended Complaint should be filed by or before July 31, 2024; Defendants may renew their motion to sever by August 14, 2024; any response is due by August 28, 2024 and any reply is due by September 4, 2024. Mailed notice.

ENTERED PARTIAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 7/24/2024. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The following Order applies only to Defendant No. 1 (Trendy Global Store); Defendant No. 3 (Bag's Generation Store); Defendant No. 8 (Elegant and Stylish Skirts Store); Defendant No. 11 (KELE FASHION); and Defendant No. 13 (Luxury Boutique Store). None of these Defendants have responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 132 is granted. Enter Partial Final Judgment Order. Mailed notice.

First AMENDED complaint by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

附件：

1:(Exhibit 2)
2:Exhibit 1

Proposal for next steps pursuant to minute order (ECF No. 130) and memorandum opinion and order (ECF No. 131) by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.

DECLARATION of Taylor J. Wilson regarding order on motion for entry of default, order on motion for default judgment, order on motion to seal, text entry, 136 Declaration of service of minute order

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The following Order applies only to Defendant Nos. 1, 3, 8, 11, & 13. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 132 for entry of default and default judgment against Defendants 1, 3, 8, 11, & 13. These defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before July 22, 2024. If no objections are filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. The motion to seal 134 is granted. Mailed notice.

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Memorandum in support of Plainitff Roadget's motion for entry of default and default judgment against Defendants Nos. 1, 3, 8, 11, & 13

附件：

1:(Exhibit 3)
2:Declaration of Taylor J. Wilson

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal Motion for leave to file supporting papers to motion for default and default judgment under seal

MEMORANDUM by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment, 132 (Redacted Version)

附件：

1:(Exhibit 3 (redacted))
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 1
4:Declaration of Taylor J. Wilson (redacted)

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for entry of default and, MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for default judgment as to Defendants Nos. 1, 3, 8, 11, and 13

附件：

1:(Exhibit A)

ENTERED MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 7/9/2024. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendants' motion to dismiss 85 is denied without prejudice, and the motion to dismiss or sever 107 is granted in part and denied in part. The second motion is tentatively granted to the extent that the Court concludes that severance is appropriate, but the Court will not order severance until Plaintiff has an opportunity to propose next steps, as indicated in the attached order. By July 23, 2024, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, file a status report indicating that it wishes to take an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), or make another motion. If so, then the Court will proceed as indicated in the order. If Plaintiff does not take one of these steps, the Court will enter an order granting the motion to sever, which would go into effect immediately. Mailed notice.

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. As To Defendant San San Clothing

STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Defendants Earna and SYLP PLUS

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. as to Defendant Longdashiye

REPLY by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to motion to sever 107

附件：

1:(Exhibit A)
2:Declaration Fahy

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. as to Defendant Simile

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The joint motion to remove incorrectly filed documents 121 is granted in part. Because the Court cannot remove a document from the docket, it directs that the items filed at 120 be sealed. Plaintiff has already refiled its corrected response to the motion at 123 and the unopposed motion to seal that response 122 is granted. Mailed notice.

SEALED RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever (Opposed) 107

附件：

1:(Exhibit 2)
2:Declaration of Taylor J. Wilson

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal Corrected Response To Motion To Sever

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. To Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents

附件：

1:(Exhibit 3)
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 1
4:Declaration of Taylor J. Wilson
5:Corrected Response

RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever (Opposed) 107

附件：

1:Exhibit 3
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 1
4:(Declaration of Taylor J. Wilson)

REPLY by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to response to motion, 111 in Support of Motion to Dismiss

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. as to Defendant GUANGZHOUSHIOUHUIMANFANGZHIPIN CO., LTD.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto by William W. Flachsbart (Corrected)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant's motion to seal 109 is granted. The document filed at 110 may remain under seal. Mailed notice.

Defendant Tianmen Shangyan Clothing Store's DBA Musangyi clothing (No. 19 in Schedule A) AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Dongguan Yizhifang Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Monca (No. 18 in Schedule A) and DBA as Saso (No. 24 in Schedule A) AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Guangzhou Aisiyuan Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Modern style (No. 16 in Schedule A) AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's response to the motion to severe 107 is due by May 30, 2024 and Defendants' reply is due by June 13, 2024.Mailed notice.

RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction 85

SEALED DOCUMENT by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Exhibit 1

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to seal Exhibit 1

MEMORANDUM by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto in support of motion to sever 107

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever (Opposed)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss 85 is due by May 15, 2024 and Defendants' reply is due by May 29, 2024. The motion to seal 87 is granted; Exhibits 1 and 2 to the motion to dismiss may remain under seal. Mailed notice.

Defendant Guangzhou Shengmin Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA TT and MM (No. 31 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Tianmen Tongxin E-Commerce Business Department's DBA TongxinShow (No. 30 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Guangzhou Tinglin Clothing Firm's DBA TL Ladies (No. 29 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Shenzhen Bao'an Xuanyi Wardrobe Clothing Factory's DBA SYLP PLUS (No. 28 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Haikou Meilan District Ayer Clothing Store's DBA Sunseeker leaf clothing (No. 27 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Haikou Longhua Huanyou Yanxuan Department Store's DBA SKE (No. 26 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Guangzhou Jinglun Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA OYIJIA (No. 22 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Tianmen Shangyan Clothing Store's DBA Musangyi clothing (No. 19 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Dongguan Yizhifang Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Monca (No. 18 in Schedule A) and DBA as Saso (No. 24 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Guangzhou Aisiyuan Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Modern style (No. 16 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Lijie He's DBA Miaoshang Clothing (No. 15 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Tianmen Maqiduo Clothing Factory's DBA Macchiatto Red (No. 14 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Guangzhou Xinfengyi Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Hongqin (No. 10 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Shahe Xiameng Clothing Store, Tianhe District, Guangzhou's DBA focus queen (No. 9 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Dongguan Humen Ruining Clothing Store's DBA Earna (No. 7 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Tianmen Zhanggang Duoxi Clothing's DBA Duoxi Clothing (No. 6 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Defendant Quanzhang Yang's DBA Cantonese C (No. 5 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

SEALED DOCUMENT by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Exhibit 1 and

附件：

1:(Exhibit 2)

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to seal document memorandum in support of motion, 86 Exhibits 1 and 2

MEMORANDUM by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, 85

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:(Exhibit 2)

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

ORDER Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 4/24/2024. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendants' motion 82 regarding a preliminary injunction is granted. The parties have agreed that the modified TRO [ 77, 78 ] should remain in effect as a preliminary injunction until the final disposition of this case or until it is terminated by mutual agreement or otherwise. A separate Order will issue. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 47 is stricken as moot. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto for Entry of Proposed Order Regarding Preliminary Injunction

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Certain Defendants' unopposed motion for an extension of time 80 is granted. Defendant Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31's response to the motion for a preliminary injunction is now due by April 24, 2024. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion for preliminary injunction 47 (UNOPPOSED)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins:The TRO is modified consistent with the separate sealed order issued today. Mailed notice.

ORDER written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 4/16/2024. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendants' motion to modify the TRO 42 is granted. The asset freeze will be reduced to the total amount of revenue generated from the allegedly infringing products as reflected in the Temu data, for a total of $176,408.50 across the relevant Defendants. By tomorrow, April 17, 2024, the parties shall submit to the Court's proposed order inbox a modified TRO consistent with this Order. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31 unopposed motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise plead 74 is granted. These Defendants' responsive pleading is now due by April 30, 2024. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond to Complaint

ORDER signed by Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The following applies only to Defendants 1, 3, 8, 11, 13, 20, and 21. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction as to these Defendants only is granted. The motion remains pending as to the remaining Defendants. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established 65 that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of the relevant defendants. Enter preliminary injunction order. Mailed notice.

STATUS Report (Joint) by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The following does not apply to Defendant Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31. The Court intends to grant a preliminary injunction as to the remaining Defendants. Plaintiff has established that it provided electronic notice to the remaining defendants, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of the remaining Defendant by the April 5, 2024 deadline. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to send a proposed order naming the relevant Defendants to the Court's proposed order box by April 11, 2024. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court are several Defendants' motion to modify the temporary restraining order ("TRO") 42. The motions to seal filings in connection with that motion 57, 67 are granted. The Defendants state that their investigation into the profits derived from sales of the allegedly infringing products continues, but in the interim, they propose that the TRO be reduced to the amount of the total sales of the allegedly infringing products. 45 at 3. Plaintiff does not appear to dispute that an asset freeze can only properly reach the amount of profits attributable to the infringing products, but it argues that because that figure is unknown, it is proper to maintain the asset freeze as to all funds in Defendants' accounts. 58 at 2-3. The Court agrees that it is important to protect Plaintiff's rights while determining the profits that may be subject to a disgorgement remedy, but ultimately the Court agrees with Defendants that reducing the asset freeze to the amount of sales of allegedly infringing products is sufficient to protect Plaintiff's ability to recover the funds it is entitled to via an equitable remedy without subjecting Defendants to an overbroad injunction. This is the approach that the courts in two other Roadget Schedule A cases have taken, see 45 at 3-4, and the Court will follow it here, too. The Court will not modify the TRO now, however, because Plaintiff also objects to the reliability of Defendants' evidence of the amount of sales. 58 at 4-5. In their reply 68, Defendants provide additional evidence from the Temu representative. The Court directs the parties to meet and confer and to file a joint status report by April 10, 2024, stating: (1) whether they have reached an agreement about the proper amount of assets to freeze; (2) if not, how the parties propose to adjudicate any dispute about the proper scope of the asset freeze, including a proposal for an evidentiary hearing, should one be necessary. If the parties believe a hearing is necessary, they should be aware that the Court generally does not permit testifying witnesses to appear remotely, although it may consider making exceptions in this case given the case's preliminary posture and the possible logistical difficulties in securing in-person testimony in a timely fashion. As an alternative or complement to a modification of the TRO, the Court would also entertain dissolving or modifying the TRO if a Defendant posts bond for the amount of the frozen assets; if the Court reduces the amount of the asset freeze, any bond would likewise be reduced. Such a reduction could be done as soon as practicable, permitting Defendants to resume operation of their stores with respect to non-challenged products. If any Defendant wishes to pursue this option, it should consult with Plaintiff to see if Plaintiff opposes to a modification of the TRO for this purpose. For now, the motion to modify the TRO 42 is entered and continued. Mailed notice.

SEALED REPLY by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sealed response, 58 In Support Of Defendants' Emergency Opposed Motion To Modify TRO

附件：

1:Declaration March 29 2024 Casaceli Declaration
2:(Exhibit A to March 29 2024 Casaceli Declaration)

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to seal document reply to response to motion, 66 (UNOPPOSED)

REPLY by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sealed response, 58 In Support Of Defendants' Emergency Opposed Motion To Modify TRO (REDACTED)

附件：

1:Declaration March 29 2024 Casaceli Declaration
2:(Exhibit A to March 29 2024 Casaceli Declaration)

DECLARATION of Taylor J. Wilson of Service

附件：

1:(Exhibit A)

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 4/3/2024, answer due 4/24/2024.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Certain Defendants' have filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to respond the preliminary injunction motion 61, which is granted. Those Defendants who have sought an extension of time (that is, Defendant Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31) may file their response by April 19, 2024; any reply is due by April 26, 2024. All other Defendants who have not so moved for an extension must still file any opposition by April 5, 2024, as previously ordered 60. Mailed notice.

DECLARATION of Taylor J. Wilson

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion for preliminary injunction 47 (UNOPPOSED)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 47 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, Plaintiff must serve all remaining Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects by April 5, 2024." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering the TRO, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion to extend the TRO 52 until the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice.

NOTICE by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto of Intent to File Reply in Support of Emergency Motion to Modify Temporary Restraining Order

SEALED RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Emergency Opposed Motion to Modify TRO 42

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal Response To Motion To Modify Temporary Restraining Order (Unopposed)

RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Emergency Opposed Motion to Modify TRO 42

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's unopposed motion to seal 49 is granted. The material filed in support of the request for a preliminary injunction may remain under seal. Defendants' motion to seal certain material submitted with the motion to modify the TRO 44 is also granted. The material filed in support of that motion may remain under seal. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Certain Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead 53 is granted. The moving Defendants' responsive pleading is now due by April 16, 2024. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond to Complaint

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. To Extend The TRO Through The Disposition Of The Preliminary Injunction Motion

附件：

1:Memorandum In Support
2:(Exhibit 1)

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. - Sealed Declaration Of Taylor J. Wilson In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction

附件：

1:(Exhibit 2)

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. - Sealed Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion For Entry Of A Preliminary Injunction

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal Supporting Papers To Motion For Preliminary Injunction (Unopposed)

MEMORANDUM by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. in support of motion for preliminary injunction 47

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for preliminary injunction

附件：

1:Text of Proposed Order
2:Declaration of Taylor J. Wilson
3:Exhibit 1
4:(Exhibit 2)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Several Defendants move to modify the terms of the temporary restraining order ("TRO") the Court issued 42. The Court agrees with Defendants that Plaintiff's requested 28 days to respond is too long under these circumstances. Plaintiff's response is due by March 28, 2024 and should also state Plaintiff's position on Defendants' motion to seal 44. If Defendants wish to file a reply, they must so indicate by 12:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time on March 29, 2024; any reply shall be filed by April 3, 2024. Mailed notice.

SEALED DOCUMENT by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' OPPOSED EMERGENCY MOTION TO MODIFY TRO

附件：

1:Declaration Casaceli
2:Exhibit A to Casaceli Decl
3:Declaration Xu
4:Declaration Liu
5:Declaration He
6:Declaration Gu
7:Declaration Yang
8:Declaration Luo
9:(Declaration Ji)

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to seal document memorandum in support of motion, 43 the Casaceli Declaration with Exhibit A and the Yang Decl., Gu Decl., Liu Decl., Xu Decl., Ji Decl., He Decl., and Luo Decl.

MEMORANDUM by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 42 EMERGENCY OPPOSED MOTION (redacted version)

附件：

1:Declaration Casaceli
2:Exhibit A to Casaceli Decl
3:Declaration Xu
4:Declaration Liu
5:Declaration He
6:Declaration Gu
7:Declaration Yang
8:Declaration Luo
9:(Declaration Ji)

MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Emergency Opposed Motion to Modify TRO

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion to extend the TRO 40 is granted. The TRO is extended through and including April 2, 2024. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. To Extend Temporary Restraining Order (Ex Parte)

附件：

1:(Memorandum In Support)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto by Christopher James Fahy Defendants 2, 4-7, 9, 10, 12, 14-19, and 22-31 in Sched. A to the Complaint

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto by William W. Flachsbart for Defendant No. 2, 4-7, 9, 10, 12, 14-19, 22-31

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 3/12/2024, answer due 4/2/2024.

附件：

1:Declaration of Service
2:(Exhibit A)

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. (Document not scanned.)

Sealed Order written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 3/5/2024. Mailed notice.

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Declaration of Deepa A. Chari

附件：

1:(Exhibit 1)

STATEMENT by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Regarding Temporary Restraining Order

附件：

1:Declaration of Deepa A. Chari
2:(Exhibit 1)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, Plaintiff's sealed motion for a temporary restraining order 16 is granted in part and continued in part. By March 4, 2024, Plaintiff is to submit a revised proposed TRO order to the Court's proposed order inbox that (1) limits the Defendants to which it applies to those specified in the attached Order; (2) includes a schedule of those Defendants in the body of the Order; and (3) contains any other edits necessary to be consistent with the Order. Also by March 4, 2024, Plaintiff shall file on the docket a statement regarding next steps as to the Defendants to which the TRO will not apply, including (1) whether and when Plaintiff will submit evidence of those Defendants' infringement, as discussed in the attached Order; and (2) Plaintiff's view on whether the TRO the Court has granted should not be issued immediately because a TRO entered by the Court, and the related portions of the Complaint, would need to be unsealed once an asset freeze has gone into effect to ensure the affected Defendants can respond. Further, at any time, Plaintiff may submit: (1) evidence of other Defendants' infringement without needing to formally move for a TRO or rehash points made in Plaintiff's earlier papers; and (2) an additional proposed TRO order that also applies to those Defendants. If such a proposed TRO order referenced in point (2) is submitted concurrently with the proposed TRO order the Court requested above, it should be drafted to apply also to the Defendants to which the attached Order applies. Plaintiff may file statements referred to in this minute entry under seal. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion to seal 27 is granted. The filing at 28 may remain sealed. Mailed notice.

SEALED REPLY by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to Response 24 by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC To Motion For Temporary Restraining Order

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 4
3:(Exhibit 5)

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal Reply To Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig PLLC's Amicus Curiae Brief

REPLY by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to Response 24

附件：

1:Declaration of Taylor J. Wilson
2:Exhibit 1
3:Exhibit 2
4:Exhibit 3
5:Exhibit 4
6:(Exhibit 5)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. by Taylor James Wilson

RESPONSE by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC to motion for temporary restraining order, 14 as Amicus Curiae

附件：

1:Exhibit A
2:(Exhibit B)

NOTICE by Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC of Intent to File Amicus Brief

ORDER written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 2/13/2024. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Over Plaintiff's opposition, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC's motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief 17 is granted. Its motion for leave to file a reply brief 20 is denied as moot. See attached order for details. If the Firm wishes to file a response brief to Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, it must so indicate by February 15, 2024; the brief is due by February 20, 2024. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due by February 27, 2024. Separately, as explained in the attached order, by February 20, 2024, the Firm shall file a statement describing whether it has been paid for its work on its amicus filings and whether it will attempt to collect for that work from any future client. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC for leave to file a Reply in Support of Amicus Curiae Brief

RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.in Opposition to MOTION by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief 17

附件：

1:(Second Declaration of Tim Wei)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Any response to the motion for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief 17 is due by February 9, 2024. No reply is to be filed unless the Court requests one. The motion to seal 15 is granted. The motion for a TRO [ 14 (redacted), 16 (sealed)] is entered and continued until after the Court resolves the amicus motion. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief

SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd., MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for temporary restraining order

附件：

1:Plaintiff 's Memorandum (Sealed) IN Support of its Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order
2:Declaration of Tim Wei
3:Declaration of Deepa A. Chari
4:Exhibit 01 (Sealed)
5:Exhibit 02 (Sealed)
6:Exhibit 03 (Sealed)
7:Exhibit 04 (Sealed)
8:Exhibit 05 (Sealed)
9:Exhibit 06 (Sealed)
10:Exhibit 07 (Sealed)
11:Exhibit 08 (Sealed)
12:Exhibit 09 (Sealed)
13:Exhibit 10 (Sealed)
14:Exhibit 11 (Sealed)
15:Exhibit 12 (Sealed)
16:Exhibit 13 (Sealed)
17:Exhibit 14 (Sealed)
18:Exhibit 15 (Sealed)
19:Exhibit 16 (Sealed)
20:Exhibit 17 (Sealed)
21:Exhibit 18
22:(Exhibit 19)

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal document MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for temporary restraining order 14 Supporting Papers

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for temporary restraining order

附件：

1:Plaintiff Roadget Business PTE. Ltd.'s Memorandum (Redacted) in Support of its Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order
2:Declaration of Tim Wei
3:Declaration of Deepa Chari
4:Exhibit 1 (Redacted)
5:Exhibit 2 (Redacted)
6:Exhibit 3 (Redacted)
7:Exhibit 4 (Redacted)
8:Exhibit 5 (Redacted)
9:Exhibit 6 (Redacted)
10:Exhibit 7 (Redacted)
11:Exhibit 8 (Redacted)
12:Exhibit 9 (Redacted)
13:Exhibit 10 (Redacted)
14:Exhibit 11 (Redacted)
15:Exhibit 12 (Redacted)
16:Exhibit 13 (Redacted)
17:Exhibit 14 (Redacted)
18:Exhibit 15 (Redacted)
19:Exhibit 16 (Redacted)
20:Exhibit 17 (Redacted)
21:Exhibit 18 - Semrush Data
22:(Exhibit 19 - Apptweak Data)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief 11 is granted. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file the complaint under seal 7 is granted in part and denied in part. In light of the other cases Plaintiff has filed in this district touching on the matters raised by this case, the Court struggles to see why an indefinite period for sealing is warranted. Consistent with the ruling in Roadget Business v. Schedule A, Case No. 24-cv-115 [Dkt. 19], the motion is granted for ten (10) days only.Mailed notice.

MOTION by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief

附件：

1:(Exhibit)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC by William W. Flachsbart

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Sealed Complaint

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4
5:Exhibit 5
6:Exhibit 6
7:Exhibit 7
8:Exhibit 8
9:(Exhibit 9)

MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal (Motion for leave to file complaint under seal)

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. by Deepa Arundati Chari

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. by Matthew D. Binder

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. by Steven Joseph Horowitz

CIVIL Cover Sheet

COMPLAINT (Redacted Version) filed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21559510.

附件：

1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4
5:Exhibit 5
6:Exhibit 6
7:Exhibit 7
8:Exhibit 8
9:(Exhibit 9)